The reviewers lack of understanding the game is sad. WW2OL is not a standard FPS. Nor for that matter the staff here. A staff poster comparing WW2OL to PS in the saying "WW2OL is like planetside just in a diff time frame" Sad and pathic. Add in the fact the WW2OL came out years before PS its easy to see these reviews have no clue. As a combat soldier WW2OL is the most realistic battlefield short of going to one in real life. In some respects it provides better training then the army does. I've played just about every FPS out there and quit them because I take no fun in killing noobs and ctned
being bored within 2 to 3 weeks because no one of any skills plays... or in cases like PS or BF2 have the game setup sololy to prevent ppl like me from raping noobs like the ppl on this web site. WW2OL has a huge number of soldiers from many armies across the world playing it... why because they know whats real and whats not. Holding WW2OL to a fake standard set by other FPS is wrong. The fact that the game as a reviewer in the past said "has a learning curve that would give a mtn goat vertigo" is what makes the game worth playing. You whine best its to hard... for true gamers being hard is th
