It looks like the entire WW2OL playerbase (all fifty of them) has stopped dissing their game in their own forums long enough to protest that someone else dissing their game.
You know, I'd like to ask why you guys think the snippet of information that Clipsco wrote in his opinion is considered a "review". Seriously folks, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. And it shows that you have nothing else better to do with your time then to come on here and complain. Do you see the Anarchy Online crowd in here? No? Why not? It's not that they don't have WAY more subscribers than WWIIO. It's because they don't take what was said as an "official review" of their game.
Registered
» Reply to this comment...
2.
27-08-2007 17:36
I don't believe asking that a reviewer atleast have factual information in his review is too much to ask. I also don't believe pointing out a piss poor review is a bad thing either.
Guest
» Reply to this comment...
3.
27-08-2007 08:29
So? Whats wrong with that? This means they're dedicated and willing unlike players of other MMGO's.
Guest
» Reply to this comment...
4.
27-08-2007 08:32
It means even your community thinks your game is shit. It's like talking about your sister. You can't stand it when somebody else says your sister is a whore, even though you know it's true.
